Sinister: Re: Echo's Answer (A duck's quack)


Sinister: Re: Echo's Answer (A duck's quack)


To: Looper are better than BandS <sinister@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Sinister: Re: Echo's Answer (A duck's quack)
From: Five Scal Louis <dougal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:21:46 +0100 (BST)


Jun 22, Hello marcobraca@xxxxxxxxx :}

{} Yes, I'm still here from 11 years!
{} marco#7
{}
{} hi Cal...


If this is going to turn into a role call, I've been lurking for about
10.5 years... this is my 4th email in that time... I hope you're all still
here in two years when I reach the magically fifth post... sure to be good
so you'd better stick around :-)

Louis

--
Character is much easier kept than recovered.  -Thomas Paine
Dougal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                               +44(0)7777 601 691
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
       +---+  Brought to you by the Sinister mailing list  +---+
    To send to the list mail sinister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe
    send "unsubscribe sinister" or "unsubscribe sinister-digest" to
    majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  WWW: http://www.missprint.org/sinister
+-+       "sinsietr is a bit freaky" - stuart david, looper           +-+
+-+  "legion of bedroom saddo devotees" "peculiarly deranged fanbase" +-+
+-+    "pasty-faced vegan geeks... and we LOST!" - NME April 2000     +-+
+-+  "frighteningly named Sinister List organisation" - NME May 2000  +-+
+-+  "sick posse of f**ked in the head psycho-fans" - NME June 2001   +-+
+-+               Nee, nee mun pish, chan pai dee kwa                 +-+
+-+               Snipp snapp snut, sa var sagan slut!                +-+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>


Please do not use content, messages or parts of messages from this list
for third-party publications (including WWW) without prior permission.
The author of each message retains copyright.